Comparison · Updated March 2026
webhooks.cc vs Hookdeck
Looking for a Hookdeck alternative for webhook development and testing? webhooks.cc captures webhooks, inspects payloads, replays requests, and lets you write automated test assertions. Hookdeck handles production infrastructure — retries, rate limiting, routing, and delivery guarantees. They solve different problems and work well together.
Feature comparison
| Feature | webhooks.cc | Hookdeck |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Webhook testing & development | Webhook infrastructure & reliability |
| Webhook capture & inspection | Yes — core feature | Yes — event log |
| Retry & delivery guarantees | No | Yes — core feature |
| Rate limiting & throttling | No | Yes |
| Webhook routing & fan-out | No | Yes |
| Dead-letter queue | No | Yes |
| Mock responses | Yes — per endpoint | No |
| Request replay | Yes — to any URL | Yes — redelivery |
| CLI tunnel to localhost | Yes (whk tunnel) | Yes (hookdeck listen) |
| TypeScript SDK | Yes — test assertions | Yes — infrastructure API |
| CI test assertions (waitFor) | Yes | No |
| MCP server for AI agents | Yes — @webhooks-cc/mcp | No |
| Open source | Yes (AGPL + MIT) | Partially |
| Team collaboration | Pro ($8/mo), up to 25 members | Team+ ($39/mo), unlimited seats |
| Free tier features | Everything except Teams | Limited events/month |
Try it yourself
Key differences
Development testing vs production reliability
webhooks.cc captures every incoming webhook and makes it available for inspection, search, export, and replay. Its SDK lets you assert on payloads in CI test suites. Hookdeck sits in your production webhook delivery path — it receives webhooks, applies retries, rate limiting, and routing rules, then delivers them to your server. One is for building; the other is for running.
AI agent integration
webhooks.cc provides an MCP server with 11 tools for AI coding agents — create endpoints, send test payloads, inspect responses, replay requests. This lets agents like Cursor, Claude Code, and Windsurf handle webhook testing without manual dashboard interaction. Hookdeck does not offer MCP integration.
Complementary tools
These tools are not mutually exclusive. A common pattern: use webhooks.cc during development to capture and debug webhook payloads, write SDK assertions in your test suite, then use Hookdeck in production for reliable delivery with retries and rate limiting. For teams, webhooks.cc Pro costs $8/month with up to 25 members, while Hookdeck's Team plan starts at $39/month with unlimited seats.
Choose webhooks.cc when you need
- Inspect and debug webhook payloads during development
- Write automated test assertions on webhook content
- Replay captured requests against your handler
- AI agent tooling for webhook workflows (MCP)
- Mock responses returned to webhook senders
Choose Hookdeck when you need
- Production webhook reliability with retries
- Rate limiting and throttling for high-volume webhooks
- Webhook routing and fan-out to multiple destinations
- Dead-letter queues for failed deliveries
- Infrastructure-grade webhook management
Frequently asked questions
What are the best Hookdeck alternatives in 2026?
It depends on what you need. If you need a webhook development and testing tool, webhooks.cc is a strong alternative — it captures, inspects, and replays webhooks with SDK assertions and MCP tooling. If you need production webhook infrastructure with retries and routing, alternatives include Svix and cloud-native solutions like AWS EventBridge. webhooks.cc and Hookdeck are complementary tools — one for development, one for production.
What is the difference between webhooks.cc and Hookdeck?
Hookdeck is webhook infrastructure for production — it sits between webhook senders and your server, handling retries, rate limiting, routing, and delivery guarantees. webhooks.cc is a development and testing tool — it captures webhooks so you can inspect, replay, and assert on payloads during development and CI. Hookdeck solves reliability in production. webhooks.cc solves visibility during development.
Can I use webhooks.cc and Hookdeck together?
Yes. You can use webhooks.cc during development to capture and test webhook payloads, then use Hookdeck in production for reliable delivery and retry logic. They address different phases of the webhook lifecycle.
Does Hookdeck have a free tier?
Yes. Hookdeck offers a free tier with limited events per month. webhooks.cc also offers a free tier with every feature included on both tiers — only Teams (invite members, share endpoints) requires Pro. The paid plan raises rate limits and retention.
Does webhooks.cc handle webhook retries and delivery guarantees?
No. webhooks.cc is a testing tool — it captures and stores incoming webhooks for inspection, replay, and automated assertions. It does not sit in your production webhook delivery path. For production reliability (retries, rate limiting, dead-letter queues), Hookdeck or a similar infrastructure tool is the right choice.
See also: vs RequestBin · vs Webhook.site · vs ngrok · All comparisons
Start testing webhooks in under a minute
Sign up with one click. No credit card, no setup wizard, no trial limits on core features.