Comparison · Updated October 2026
webhooks.cc vs Webhook.site
If you're evaluating Webhook.site alternatives, here's the short version: both tools capture and inspect webhooks. webhooks.cc goes further with a TypeScript SDK for CI test assertions, a CLI tunnel for local development, and an MCP server for AI-assisted workflows — every individual feature included on both tiers, with Teams (invite members, share endpoints) billed separately at $12/seat/mo.
Feature comparison
| Feature | webhooks.cc | Webhook.site |
|---|---|---|
| Webhook capture & inspection | Yes | Yes |
| Mock responses | Yes | Yes (paid) |
| Request replay | Yes | Yes |
| Search & filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Export (JSON / CSV) | Yes | Yes |
| CLI tunnel to localhost | Yes | Yes |
| Email capture | Yes, every account endpoint on every plan | Yes, every URL |
| Email forwarded as signed JSON, with retries | Yes, every plan | Through Custom Actions (paid plans) |
| TypeScript SDK | Yes — @webhooks-cc/sdk | No first-party SDK |
| CI test assertions (waitFor) | Yes | No |
| MCP server for AI agents | Yes — @webhooks-cc/mcp | No |
| Request body matchers | Yes (method, header, body path) | No |
| SSE real-time streaming | Yes | No |
| Open source | Yes (AGPL + MIT) | No |
| Team collaboration | $12/seat/mo, pooled quota | Enterprise only, from $69/mo |
| Free tier features | Every individual feature | Some features paid-only |
Try it yourself
Key differences
SDK for automated testing
webhooks.cc publishes @webhooks-cc/sdk on npm. Use waitFor() to poll for incoming requests during integration tests, match on method, headers, or JSON body paths, and assert directly in Vitest or Jest. Webhook.site offers an API but no first-party SDK with built-in test helpers.
MCP server for AI agents
@webhooks-cc/mcp exposes 11 tools — create endpoints, send test payloads, inspect captured requests, replay, and more — so Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, or any MCP-compatible agent can drive webhook workflows without leaving the editor. Webhook.site does not offer MCP support.
Email capture and forwarding
Both tools give you an email address to send test mail to. Webhook.site hands one out with every URL, no account needed. webhooks.cc gives one to every endpoint on an account, free included, picks out the one-time code and main link, and shows the SPF, DKIM and DMARC results. Its forwarding posts every email to your server as parsed JSON, signed with Standard Webhooks headers and retried for about a day, on every plan. On Webhook.site, acting on incoming email takes Custom Actions, which are part of its paid plans. See email testing and email to webhook.
Pricing model
Every individual feature is included on both free and paid tiers. Teams (invite members, share endpoints) is its own per-team subscription at $12/seat/month, where each seat adds 100,000 pooled requests. Webhook.site reserves team collaboration for its Enterprise tier, starting at $69/month. The paid plan raises request limits and extends retention. Webhook.site gates some features (custom responses, API access) behind paid tiers.
Choose webhooks.cc when you need
- Webhook assertions in CI pipelines (SDK waitFor)
- AI agents that create, inspect, and replay webhooks (MCP)
- A CLI tunnel purpose-built for webhook forwarding
- Email capture with codes, links and sender checks
- Inbound email forwarded to your server as signed JSON, on the free plan
- Every individual feature on both tiers, plus teams at $12/seat/mo
- Open-source codebase you can inspect and self-host
Choose Webhook.site when you need
- A well-established tool with a large existing user base
- Quick browser-only inspection with no install
- An email address without creating an account
- Familiarity — your team already uses it
Frequently asked questions
What are the best Webhook.site alternatives in 2026?
webhooks.cc is a strong Webhook.site alternative for developers who need automated webhook testing. It adds a TypeScript SDK with test assertions, a native CLI tunnel, an MCP server for AI coding agents, and a free tier where every individual feature is included, with Teams (invite members, share endpoints) billed separately at $12/seat/mo. Other alternatives include Beeceptor (API mocking focus), RequestBin/Pipedream (workflow automation), and Hookdeck (production webhook infrastructure).
What is the main difference between webhooks.cc and Webhook.site?
Both tools capture and inspect incoming webhooks. webhooks.cc adds a TypeScript SDK for writing webhook assertions in automated tests, a native CLI for tunneling to localhost, and an MCP server so AI coding agents can create, inspect, and replay webhooks programmatically.
Does webhooks.cc have a free plan like Webhook.site?
Yes. Every individual feature is included on both tiers — inspection, replay, mock responses, CLI tunnel, SDK, and MCP. The paid plan raises rate limits and extends request retention. Teams (invite members, share endpoints) is a separate per-team subscription at $12/seat/mo.
Can I use webhooks.cc for CI/CD webhook testing?
Yes. The TypeScript SDK provides a waitFor() method that polls for incoming requests with configurable matchers (method, headers, body fields). You can assert on webhook payloads directly inside Vitest or Jest test suites.
Does webhooks.cc capture emails like Webhook.site?
Yes. Every endpoint on a webhooks.cc account, free included, has an email address at mailhooks.cc. Each email shows the one-time code and main link it contains and its SPF, DKIM and DMARC results, and forwarding posts it to your server as signed JSON with retries. Webhook.site gives every URL an email address without an account; acting on incoming email there takes Custom Actions, which are part of its paid plans.
Does Webhook.site have an SDK or MCP server?
Webhook.site offers an API but no first-party TypeScript SDK with test assertion helpers. It also does not provide an MCP server for AI coding agent integration.
Which Webhook.site alternatives work for teams?
webhooks.cc Teams shares endpoints with signed-in team members, keeps team-billed requests for 31 days, and costs $12 per seat per month with 100,000 requests per seat pooled across the team. Webhook.site lists team features on its Enterprise plan.
See also: vs ngrok · vs Beeceptor · vs RequestBin · All comparisons
Start testing webhooks in under a minute
Sign up with one click. No credit card, no setup wizard, no trial limits on core features.